\begin{table}[t!]
\begin{center}
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{scriptsize}
\caption{Radical and moderate candidates: Reduced-form and second-stage estimates\label{EEREV-D-21-00004_Table6}}
\begin{tabular*}{\columnwidth}{@{\extracolsep{\stretch{1}}}l*{8}{c}@{}}
\hline
\hline
&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(1)} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(2)}  &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(3)} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(4)} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(5)}  &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(6)}  &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(7)} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(8)}\\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{\textit{Election year}}&\multicolumn{1}{c}{1965} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{1969} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{1974} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{1995}  &\multicolumn{1}{c}{2002} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{2007} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{2012} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{2017}\\
\cmidrule(lr){2-9}
& \multicolumn{8}{c}{Panel A: Reduced-Form Estimates. Dep. Variable: Candidate vote (\% of registered)}\\
\hline
\\ Eligible births (\%)&     --0.259***&     --0.449***&     --0.404***&     --0.042** &     --0.009   &     --0.027** &     --0.020   &     --0.034***\\
                    &     (0.038)   &     (0.074)   &     (0.039)   &     (0.016)   &     (0.010)   &     (0.012)   &     (0.014)   &     (0.010)   \\
[0.3em] Eligible births (\%) $ \times $ Radicalism [std]&       0.099***&       0.182***&       0.162***&       0.034** &       0.011   &       0.011   &       0.012   &       0.017** \\
                    &     (0.020)   &     (0.034)   &     (0.016)   &     (0.013)   &     (0.008)   &     (0.011)   &     (0.012)   &     (0.007)   \\

\\
\cmidrule(lr){2-9}
& \multicolumn{8}{c}{Panel B: 2SLS Estimates. Dep. Variable: Candidate vote (\% of registered)}\\
\hline
\\ Conscription proxy (\%)&     --0.726***&     --1.258***&     --1.133***&     --0.117** &     --0.024   &     --0.075** &     --0.055   &     --0.095***\\
                    &     (0.156)   &     (0.282)   &     (0.205)   &     (0.047)   &     (0.028)   &     (0.033)   &     (0.038)   &     (0.032)   \\
[0.3em] Conscription (\%) $ \times $ Radicalism [std]&       0.254***&       0.489***&       0.477***&       0.112** &       0.042   &       0.029   &       0.039   &       0.055** \\
                    &     (0.073)   &     (0.120)   &     (0.092)   &     (0.046)   &     (0.028)   &     (0.036)   &     (0.042)   &     (0.024)   \\

\\ First-stage $ F $-statistic&        6.45   &        6.75   &        6.99   &        6.90   &        6.38   &        7.03   &        6.59   &        6.28   \\
Underidentification $ F $-statistic&       12.54   &       13.13   &       12.96   &       13.36   &       12.31   &       13.34   &       12.70   &       11.98   \\
\\
Candidate-lat-lon polynomial & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd & 2nd \\ 

Candidate-border segment FE &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   \\
Candidate-dialect FE &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   \\
Full set of controls $ \times $ Radicalism [std] &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   &         Yes   \\
\hline
Mean dependent variable&       14.12   &       10.91   &        6.91   &        8.91   &        4.48   &        6.94   &        8.06   &        7.21   \\
Observations        &       2,772   &       3,234   &       5,544   &       4,158   &       7,392   &       5,544   &       4,620   &       5,082   \\
Clusters            &         462   &         462   &         462   &         462   &         462   &         462   &         462   &         462   \\


\hline
Candidate radicalism distribution\\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Median candidate (std.dev.)}&        1.05   &        0.87   &        1.52   &        0.19   &        0.51   &        0.23   &        0.71   &        0.80   \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Most radical candidate (std.dev.)}&        2.53   &        2.50   &        3.71   &        3.46   &        3.73   &        3.60   &        4.30   &        4.61   \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular*}
\end{scriptsize}
\begin{tablenotes}[normal,flushleft]
\begin{scriptsize}
\item \emph{Notes}:
2SLS estimates of the effect of conscription into the Wehrmacht on support for radical and moderate candidates. 
The unit of observation is a municipality $ \times $ candidate. 
Standard errors clustered at the municipality level in parentheses. 
Panel A: Reduced-form estimates with respect to the degree of a candidate's radical discourse; 
Panel B: 2SLS estimates. 
Each column presents the estimation for a different election. 
The radicalism measure is constructed as the share of quasi-sentences with a negative tone 
from the Comparative Manifesto Project \citep{Schmitt2018}. 
The radicalism measure has been standardized and re-scaled to take a value of 0 for the most moderate candidate within an election. 
All specifications include a candidate-specific quadratic polynomial in latitude and longitude ($ x+y+x^2+y^2+xy $). 
First-stage F-statistic is the Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F-statistic of the first-stage estimation with eligible births as the exogenous instrument. 
* significant at 10\%; ** at 5\%; *** at 1\%. 
\end{scriptsize}
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{center}
\end{table}
